Thursday, April 24, 2014

From Sacks to Sex

Recently I had to write a research paper for my History class over any topic I desired.  Literally anything.  Since I'm basically interested in two things, France and fashion, and I've already written plenty of papers over France by force, I chose to explore women's fashion.  I wanted to know how we got to where we are today, trend wise.  I also got an A on this paper, the only points being deducted for not having page numbers.  Not to toot my own horn, but I'm proud and I think the topic is interesting so I decided to post it for everyone to read. Enjoy.
Women’s Fashion throughout History:  From Sacks to Sex

            How is a woman defined in today’s society?  Most people would agree that a woman is a fragile yet fierce, sexy yet elegant, and yielding yet obstinate being.  She is the bringer of life, the consoler of hearts and the strength of many.  Women have come a long way in society since the beginning of time.  The woman was once the passive member of the home who complied with every order of the man.  Today, a woman can hold her own.  A woman can be sexy and fierce and unyielding without the judgment of man and with acceptance from society.  One aspect of the woman that has expressed her character throughout history is her clothes.  From the conservative and shapeless wardrobe of the medieval age to the suggestive and tight-fitting trends today, there have been many changes to the way a woman presents herself. 

            Women have always been referred to as the delicate sex.  With their smaller frames and softer outer shell, this is an understandable conception.  In most cases when someone obtains something that is fragile, he or she will try to protect it or keep it safe.  This is more or less the point of view towards women in earlier times.  Men saw women as weak, but also precious and something that should be contained.  This is what began the traditional wardrobe of the woman.  Women were always covered from head to toe.  In the medieval era of the 1300’s, women dressed in sack-like garments.  All was covered and there was no shape or figure to the body.  There was no hope for women’s fashion at that time whereas the men’s dress was created to enhance the beauty of their bodies to promote masculinity.  The original expressive aim of female dress was modesty and this is still practiced in some cultures and religions today.[1]  However, women could not flaunt their curves or even their skin up until the fourteenth century.
            The fourteenth century marked the beginning of a revolution for women’s clothing.  Up until then, women could not show any skin or they would be basically shunned from society.  Women began showing more skin in the 1500’s however.  The lowering of the neckline instigated the potential new view of the woman.  She was no longer the precious being in which you protected.  She was now starting to show the sexy side of herself.  France referred to this change as “décolletage” or “selective exposer of the skin.”[2]  This décolletage aroused a new erotic view of women.  The idea of women as sexual figures sparked the change in women’s fashion forever.  

Now that the neckline had dropped, women’s clothing could be altered differently and was done in a less modest manner.  Although dresses were always the standard attire for women, they were not varied until the sixteenth century.  Dresses became popular in more than one variation after the male revolution of the middle ages.  This was the start of real “fashion” for women.  Two-pieced dresses were common as well as the petticoat and headdress.  Petticoats were basically an undergarment that women wore under their skirts which hung from the waist to the floor.  The headdresses were important, for they expressed the ongoing theme of modesty, even though the modesty had phased out into a lesser concentration.  The petticoat and veil were major defining female garments.  When long hair and head coverings were given up in the seventeenth century, the change was shockingly profound.[3]

      Women continued to dress in two pieced dresses with petticoats and low necklines throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.  The eighteenth century introduced the importance of the silhouette of the woman’s body.  Corsets and many more petticoats were worn to exaggerate the structure of the hourglass figure.  More color and design was put into play when designing a woman’s dress during this time period.[4]  Fashion became more prominent of an idea instead of just clothing.  Women were now dressing to flaunt their curves and womanly features rather than hiding and protecting them.  The late 1800’s brought forth a brand new idea for women’s dress:  trousers. 

Trousers for women in the late 1800’s were still socially unacceptable but were worn on occasion.  Pants were worn by low-class women.  These women included dancers, acrobats, actresses, singers, mine workers, fisherfolk, and agricultural laborers.  Women had begun to work men’s jobs during this time period but were considered low-class.  Other than being low-class, pants were unacceptable because they were viewed as soft-core pornography at the time.  The separation of a woman’s legs by a piece of fabric was only used for seductive purposes and therefore was socially intolerable.[5]  Although they were not widely worn, pants had begun to appear on some women which had unknowingly originated a new revolution for women’s fashion which took place in the twentieth century.

The 1900’s opened new doors for women in many aspects, fashion of course being one of them.  World War I gave the opportunity for women to work men’s jobs while their husbands were away.  This alone gave a new idea of women’s independence and freedoms.  Publicly working women wore skirts and factory working women wore pants.[6]  Only the women working in factories and other hidden jobs wore pants because they were still not entirely accepted by the public yet.  Meanwhile in France, women’s pants were an idea for designers’ inspiration.  Paul Poiret, a French fashion designer, designed a trend of “divided skirts” which led to his first women’s trouser design in 1913 referred to as harem pants.  Harem pants were wide-legged trousers that gathered up at the ankles, giving them the look of a skirt.  These were based off of costume designs and were to be worn with a long tunic.[7] 

Aside from the skirt-like pants of Poiret, another French designer had ideas of her own.  Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel had respect for the wearing of pants.  In fact, she often wore her husband’s suits around in comfort.  Coco had once said, “Fashion does not only exist in dresses.”[8] Chanel had visited Venice, Italy in the early 1900’s and was inspired by the pants worn by the gondola rowers.  These pants influenced her design of the wide-legged women’s trouser pants.[9]  This design exploded the likeliness of a woman’s ability to wear something other than a skirt.  In the 1930’s, pants were stylish but still shocking to wear.  It was acceptable to wear pants however for sports and activities like horseback riding which were designed also by Coco Chanel.  People still saw pants on women as unnatural and masculine but this did not prevent some women from wearing them.  Famous women like Marlene Dietrich and Katherine Hepburn wore pants on a regular basis.  This made the women’s pants into a trend.  In 1939, the first vogue was issued with women in pants playing sports pictured on the cover.[10]  Pajama pants were also widely acceptable for women and seen as a fashion staple in the 1930’s.[11]

After pants became a trend in the 1930’s, the designs and variations of them increased throughout the 1900’s.  The 1940’s gave more opportunities for women to work which made pants more acceptable to wear.  However in the 1950’s, pants were discouraged more because of the post-World War II feminine look.  Although they were discouraged, they were still accepted and worn.  Audrey Hepburn created the trend of high-waist cigarette and capri pants which continued into the 1960’s. The sixties was a decade of full social acceptance of women wearing pants.  Women could wear pants casually and in the workplace judge free and comfortably.

Now that women could freely wear pants as they pleased, designers created what seemed to be a new trend of women’s pants each decade.  The seventies are known for the bell bottomed flare trousers as seen in the Charlie’s Angels movies.  The eighties was a decade of tight fitting clothing on the bottom half.  Skinny jeans and cotton leggings were worn regularly by women during this time.  The nineties consisted of the “grunge” look which normally meant baggy or ripped jeans on women.  The 1990’s put forth a vibe of “I just rolled out of bed” from everyone and women were equally as grunge as the men.[12]  In the late 1990’s, two-thirds of the women in the United States wore pants several times a week.[13]  This was the conclusion of the women’s dress revolution.  Women were allowed to express their identities through their clothes however they pleased and it was socially acceptable.

  The turn of the century introduced low-rise, boot-leg, flare, and boyfriend style jeans for women.  By 2010, all types of jeans were basically designed and so now the trends are mainly repeats of the past trends.[14]  The twenty-first century also increased the sexuality of women in their attire.  Women seem to think along the lines of “less is more” when getting dressed in this day and age.  However, it is socially acceptable. 

 In conclusion, there is a noticeable difference in the way women present themselves today compared to how they did many centuries ago.  Women started off wearing sack-like dresses that covered every inch of their body and are currently wearing less and less daily.  Women can freely express their sexuality and character with the help of fashion.  Fashion can emphasize a woman’s elegant or feminine side as well as her sexy and independent side.  Every woman can thank the historical events and courageous women and men that began and concluded the revolution of women’s fashion, for now women have the ability to wear whatever they feel.



[1] Anne Hollander, Sex and Suits (New York: Knopf, 1994), 42
[2] Anne Hollander, Sex and Suits (New York: Knopf, 1994), 47
[3] Anne Hollander, Sex and Suits (New York: Knopf, 1994), 48
[4] Fashion Timeline. Vintage Fashion Guild. Accessed March 25, 2014. http://vintagefashionguild.org/fashion-timeline/
[5] Anne Hollander, Sex and Suits (New York: Knopf, 1994), 48
[6] Trousers for Women. Fashion Encyclopedia. Accessed March 18, 2014.  http://www.fashionencyclopedia.com
[7] Valerie Steele, Paris Fashion: A Cultural History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 36.
 
 
[8] Valerie Steele, Paris Fashion: A Cultural History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 12.
[9] Fashion rewind:  A brief history of trousers through the ages. Secret Closet.  Accessed November 24, 2014.  http://www.secretcloset.pk/
[10] Trousers for Women. Fashion Encyclopedia. Accessed March 18, 2014.  http://www.fashionencyclopedia.com
[11] Fashion rewind:  A brief history of trousers through the ages. Secret Closet.  Accessed November 24, 2014.  http://www.secretcloset.pk/
 
[12] Fashion rewind:  A brief history of trousers through the ages. Secret Closet.  Accessed November 24, 2014.  http://www.secretcloset.pk/
[13] Trousers for Women. Fashion Encyclopedia. Accessed March 18, 2014.  http://www.fashionencyclopedia.com
[14] Fashion rewind:  A brief history of trousers through the ages. Secret Closet.  Accessed November 24, 2014.  http://www.secretcloset.pk/

No comments:

Post a Comment